Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40135 (AP)

Kollipara Sai Teja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12091/2019 · 2025-11-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010266602019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12091/2019 Between: 1. KOLLIPARA SAI TEJA, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 28YRS, OCC. MEDICAL SHOP, C/O VENKATESWARA HOSPITAL, CHINNA BOSU BOMMA CENTRE, PERALA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, INKOLLU POLICE STATION, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, INKOLLU POLICE STATION, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. KOLLIPARA BHAVYA SAI, W/O SAI TEJA, D/O KONDAPATRUI SRINVAS, AGED ABOUT 23YRS, R/O NEAR INDIAN GAS GODWAN, INKOLLU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents No 2 and 3 in confining the petitioner at Inkollu Police Station, Prakasam District on 03.08.2019 and forcible obtaining of the signatures of the petitioner and his father in the documents as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to return the documents which were obtained from the petitioner on 03.08.2019 under threat and coercion IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 & 3 not to call the petitioner to Police Station and interfere into the dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12091 OF 2019 ORDER: M/s.I.Uma Santhasri, learned counsel representing Sri Ramakrishna Akurathi, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 14.11.2025 Pmk 4 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:12091 OF 2019 Date: 14.11.2025 Pmk