APHC010293322023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6171/2023 Between: 1. P.Y. KIRAN KUMAR, S/O LATE YONA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PRACTICING ADVOCATE, R/O DOOR NO. 42-3-12, AJITH SINGH NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA- ( 15, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Amaravati, Guntur District., Through SHO, Nunna Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC NO 595 of 2019 Dated 07/03/2022 on the file of the Court of IN THE COURT OF THE VI METROPOLITIAN MAGISTRATE AT VIJAYAWADA for the offences punishable U/s.424, 201 202 of IPC against the petitioner/Accused No.17 including the appearance of the petitioner/Accused No.17 till the disposal of the Main Quash Petition in the interest of the justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/A.17, seeking to quash the Proceedings against him in CC No.595 of 2019 on the file of the Court of VI Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner herein is arrayed as A.17, he is falsely implicated in this case at the instance of the local politicians and he is innocent of the offence. Learned counsel would submit that except bald and omnibus allegations, no specific overt acts are attributed against him. At this juncture, learned counsel restricted the prayer and sought for a direction to dispense with the presence of the Petitioner before the trial Court and the Criminal Petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioners to raise such contentions before the trial Court in defence. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 3 Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to raise the present contentions before the trial Court in his defence. However, the presence of the Petitioner/A.17 before the trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court with regard to the subject matter. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 6171 of 2023 21.11.2025 Mjl /*