Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40112 (KAR)

SMT KRISHNAMMA v. THE TAHSILDAR

RP/308/2025 · 2025-08-23

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33093 RP No. 308 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.308 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. KRISHNAMMA, W/O CHINNARAJU M. AGED 83 YEARS, 2ND CROSS, NEAR ASHRAMA SHALE, S.N. NAGARA, SAGAR-577401 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMEER S N.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR KOPPA TALUK OFFICE, KOPPA-577126 CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, TALUK SURVEY OFFICE, TALUK OFFICE COMPLEX KOPPA TALUK- 577126, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.HEMALATHA V, AGA) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12.06.2025(KLR-RR/SUR) IN WP NO.16073/2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, PRINCIPAL BENCH, BENGALURU. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33093 RP No. 308 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. This review petition is filed to review the order dated 12th June, 2025 passed in WP No.16073/2025 (Annexure-A). 3. Heard Sri Sameer S.N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Smt. Hemalatha V., learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 4. It is submitted by Sri Sameer S.N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by referring to Annexure-C that the petitioner has already paid the fee for Phodi as per Annexure-C, and therefore, sought for review of the order referred to above. 5. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that in order to conduct Phodi, the applicant has to make an application through on-line, and if such an application is made as per Circular of the Government, the same shall be considered. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33093 RP No. 308 of 2025 6. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that since this Court has already directed the petitioner herein to make an application through on-line seeking Phodi in respect of the subject land concerned, there is no error apparent on the face of the records. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20