Ruttala Yerra Patrudu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6426/2019 · 2025-10-28
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40112 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40112 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010145512019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6426 OF 2019 Between:
1. Ruttala Yerra Patrudu,, S/o. Late Ruttala Kanna Patrudu, aged about 65 years, Hindu, Cultivation,resident of Makavarapalem village and post, Makavarapalem Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Secretariat, Velagapudi , Guntur District.
2. The Director General of Police, Vijayawada- Guntur Highway, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural.
4. Sri Karaka Ramu, Sub Inspector of Polie, Makavarapalem P.S., Visakhapatnam District.
5. Sri Pitta Nagi Reddy, Police Constable, Makavarapalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam.
6. Ruttala Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Bangarayya, Hindu, major, resident of Rachapalli village-531113, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. Ruttala Ramana, S/o. Thammayya, Hindu, major resident of Rachapalli village-531113, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
8. Thamanara Chinnichinaidu, S/o. Appalanaidu, Hindu, major resident of Rachapalli village-531113, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KALEEMULLA S Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.6426 OF 2019 ORDER:
Sri M.Noor Mahammad, learned counsel representing Sri Syed Kaleemulla, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the matter become infructuous.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 and Sri P.Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 8, are in attendance.
3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29.10.2025 Pab
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:6426 OF 2019
Date:29.10.2025
Pab