[2025:RJ-JP:51766] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15090/2025 Anoop Singhal @ Annu S/o Shri Satish Chand Singhal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Shivaji Nagar, Old City Dholpur, Police Station Kotwali, Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sampti Sharma Mr. Ajay Gupta Mr. Hari Bareth For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Kapil Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 19/12/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.137/2025 registered at Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 318(4), 316(2), 61(2), 111(3) & 316(4) B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 23.10.2025. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to [2025:RJ-JP:51766] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15090/2025] conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant-respondent have vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the factual report & the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth, custody period and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner, namely Anoop Singhal @ Annu S/o Shri Satish Chand Singhal, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /536