Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40108 (RAJ)

PATRAM JATAV S/O RAMCHARAN JATAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11107/2025 · 2025-10-14

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41861] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11107/2025 Patram Jatav S/o Ramcharan Jatav, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Alipur Talchhiri, Police Station Salempur, District Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh Mr. Jagmohan Bhardwaj for Complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 14/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 154/2025 registered at Police Station Kathumar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide order dated 11.09.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to the condition that applicant shall join investigation. It is further submitted that in compliance with the said directions, the applicant has joined the investigation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor along with counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the accused-applicant has already joined the investigation as directed vide interim order [2025:RJ-JP:41861] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11107/2025] dated 11.09.2025, therefore, looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court directs that order dated 11.09.2025 be made absolute and deems it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kathumar District Alwar in FIR No. 154/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Patram Jatav S/o Ramcharan Jatav shall be released on bail, provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. 6. It is made clear that, learned Public Prosecutor is at liberty to move appropriate application/avail efficacious remedy for cancellation of anticipatory bail application, if the facts are otherwise. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/271