Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :03.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025 C.Murugasamy Represented by his Power Rajasekaran (Rajasekaran recognised as power agent to the sole petitioner vide court order dated 28.04.2025 made in CMP No. 10528 and 10531 of 2025 in CRP SR No. 44573 of 2025) ... Petitioner in both the revisions vs
1. N.Kasthuri 2.N.Sivagurunathan 3.G.Jeyalakshmi 4.T.C.Mohanam 5.V.Kalavathy 6.S.Malarvizhi 7.B.Sudha 8.Nirmala @ Vanaja 9.D.Murugesan 10.Lakshmi Venkataraman 11.C.Mekala Devi 12.Kavitharajan 13.Muthusamy Achari 14.Chamundeeswari 15.K.Meenakshi 16.S.Jeyapaul 17.A.Lakshmi 18.Palani Asari 19.Jeyambu Rajan 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025 20.Paranthaman 21.Damodaran 22.Daisyrani 23.Vasugi 24.V.Valli 25.A.Vellayammal 26.P.L.Umayal 27.J.Raju 28.Santhi Anbazhagan 29.S.Sankar 30.A.Devabalan 31.Alli Rani 32.Saraswathy 33.N.Chandra 34.Mohamed Ali 35.Geethalakshmi 36.Renuka 37.Selvaraj Reddiar 38.Mallika 39.39.Narayanasamy Reddiyar 40.40.Usha 41.Vasundra 42.D.Shankar Reddy 43.Srinivasalu Naidu 44.Muthuranga Chetty Anna Chattiram rep by its Administrator Late Govindarajan (died) and the new trustees were not appointed/ aboundend) No.24, Buddhar Street, Block No.44, New Perangaluthur, Chennai-600 063.
45. Vasudevan
46. Ramalingam . Respondents in CRP No.2069 of 2025 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025
1. Paranthaman
2. Muthuranga Chetty Anna Chattiram rep by its Administrator Late Govindarajan (died) and the new trustees were not appointed/ aboundend) No.24, Buddhar Street, Block No.44, New Perangaluthur, Chennai-600 063. ... Respondents in CRP No.2074 of 2025
Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the suit in O.S.Nos.1426 of 2005( CRP No.2069 of 2025) and 212 of 2004 (CRP No.2074 of 2025) pending on the file of II Additional District Munsif at Pondicherry. For Petitioner : Ms.J.Jayalakshmi
COMMON ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that pending admission of these civil revision petitions, the suits in O.S.Nos. 1426 of 2005 and 212 of 2004 which are sought to be struck off, have been dismissed.
Learned counsel has filed two Memos in this regard in the above two revisions.
2. In view of the above, the fact that the above suits are no longer on file, no relief is necessary and no order can be passed in the present revisions. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025 P.B.BALAJI.,J. sr
3. In the result, both the civil revision petitions are dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to re-open the above revisions in the event of suits being restored. No costs. 03.06.2025 Index: Yes/No Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sr To The II Additional District Munsif at Pondicherry. C.R.P.Nos.2069 and 2074 of 2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis