Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40103 (PNJ)

BALJIT SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9379/2025 · 2025-04-03

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CWP-9379-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.04.2025. Baljit Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the respondent-State. *** SUDHIR SINGH , J. (Oral) Petition herein is for issuance of a Writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to decide the representation dated Annexure P4 filed by the petitioner in pursuance to the order dated 09.04.2019 (Annexure P7) passed by respondent No.5. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, the pending representation (Annexure P-4) is decided by respondent No.5, which has not been adverted to by the respondents, till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.5 and it shall take decision either way, on pending representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners. KOMAL 2025.04.09 12:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document CWP-9379-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5, i.e. Administrator, HSVP, Hisar, to consider pending representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 03.04.2025 Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.04.09 12:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document