1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7577 of 2018 1 - Sanjay Upadhyay S/o Shri Kashi Prasad Upadhyay Aged About 42 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School, Karhi, Mungeli, R/o Pahderiya Road Mungeli, Tahsil - Mungeli, District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer Mungeli, District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mungeli, District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Block Education Officer Mungeli, District - Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Ruchi Nagar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr.Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapti, Panel Lawyer For respondent No.3 : Mr. Neetesh Sahu, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15.07.2025 Heard. 1. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman after completion of 10 years of his service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in 2 case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitle for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. She further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents authorities in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 2. Learned counsels appearing for the respondents oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents authorities shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondents authorities to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of.Sd Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha