Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40095 (CAL)

SAGNIK CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRR/3753/2024 · 2025-02-14

Joymalya Bagchi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L -11 14/02/2025 Aritra Ct. No.-28 CRR 3753 of 2024 Sagnik Chakraborty & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Kajal Ray Mr. Suman Nandi ….for the petitioners 1. Petitioner contends that the allegations do not disclose ingredients of cognizable offences. 2. I have considered the materials on record. Petitioners are the son and daughter-in-law respectively of the opposite party No.2/complainant. In the complaint opposite party No.2 has alleged that she is a cardiac patient. Petitioner No.1 and his wife, that is, petitioner No.2 had held out threats at her. On 07/02/2024 they came to their residence and abused her in a threatening manner. They even poured kerosene oil with bad intention. Opposite party No.2 apprehends threat to her life and security. These uncontroverted allegations inter alia make out a case under Section 23 of the Senior Citizen Act. 3. Credibility of the allegations are subject matter of the investigation and interference in the proceeding would amount to prejudging them. 2 4. Hence I am not inclined to entertain the petition. It is open to the petitioners to agitate their defences in the event the investigation results in the filing of a police report against them. 5. With the observation the application being CRR 3753 of 2024 is disposed of. (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)