2025:JHHC:33090 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) 7296 of 2012 Most. Sumitra Rani Choudhary, W/o late Ahin Choudhary, R/o village Mahada, P.O. Barndeo, P.S. Rajoun, District- Banka (Bihar) .… Petitioner Versus 1. Syndicate Bank through Chairman-cum-Managing Director. 2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Syndicate Bank, Head Office Manipal, Karnatka. 3. The Executive Director, Syndicate Bank, Corporate Office Banglore, Karnatka 4. The General Manager(Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office Manipal 5. The Deputy General Manager(Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office-Manipal 6. The Assistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank, at Industrial Relation Division, Head Office Manipal 7. The Chief Manager, Industrial Relation Division, Syndicate Bank Head Office Manipal 8. Mr.Dipak Kapoor son of not known to the petitioner, Chief Inquiry Officer, Regional Office, Syndicate Bank, 27 Shakesphere Sarani, Kolkata 9. The Vigilance Officer, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office Kolkata 10. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Syndicate Bank Corporate Office Banglore. 11. The Executive Director, Syndicate Bank, Corporate Office Banglore. 12. The General Manager(Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office Manipal 13. The Deputy General Manager(Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office-Manipal 14. The Assistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank, at Industrial Relation Division, Head Office Manipal 15. The Chief Manager, Industrial Relation Division, Head Office Manipal 16. The Chief Vigilance Officer, Syndicate Bank, Corporate Office Banglore. 17. Canare Bank having its registered office at 112 J C Road, PO & PS-Town Hall Junction Benguluru, Karnataka. 18. Canara Bank having its Circle Office, HRM Dept at Kaushalya Chambers P.P. Compound Main Road, represented through Senior Manager, Canara Bank. ..... Respondents --------- 2025:JHHC:33090 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Vani, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, Adv. --------- 21/Dated: 30.10.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing and setting aside the order of termination dated 22.06.2011 passed by the Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office, Manipal; whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from services of the Bank for breach of Regulation No.3(1) read with Regulation No.24 of the Syndicate Bank Officers’ Employees’ (conduct) Regulation, 1976 and the same has also been affirmed by the appellate authority vide order dated 18.04.2012 passed by the General Manager (Personnel) Syndicate Bank, Head Office at Manipal. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that though the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed, but the petitioner also preferred a review application and as per the affidavit filed by the Respondent Bank, the said review application is not traceable, and no order has been passed in the review application. As such, she submits that the Respondent Bank be directed to pass an order on the review application. 3. Learned counsel representing the Bank submits that during pendency of this writ application, the Respondent Bank merged with Canara Bank and due to some reason or the other, the concerned review application is not traceable. However, upon instruction, he fairly submits that the concerned authority of the Bank may be permitted to dispose of the review 2025:JHHC:33090 3 application which is annexed as Annexure-11 to the writ application by the present reviewing authority as per the applicable Rules and guidelines of the Respondent-bank. As such, interest of justice would be sufficed by directing the Petitioner to submit the copy of the review application, which is annexed as annexure-11, to the writ petition as the same is not available with the Bank. 4. Having regard to the fair submissions, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the Respondent-Bank to pass an order on the review application, which is part and parcel of this writ application as Annexure-11, and the order passed in review shall be communicated to the petitioner and the Petitioner is also directed to serve a copy of Annexure-11 to the writ application to the concerned Respondent at the earliest. It goes without saying that the present reviewing authority shall dispose of the review application, (annexure-11), as per applicable Rules and Regulations and guidelines within a period of four months from the date of receipt of “Review Application”, which is Annexure-11 to this petition. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands disposed of. I.As, if any, is also closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) October 30, 2025 Fahim/ Uploaded on 06/11/2025