Obulapuram Paramasivam Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/12662/2025 · 2025-12-15
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40085 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40085 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[3521 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV- ■ii' m •Si V‘ WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH, .f TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX S-f :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA lA No. 2 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO; 12662 OF 2025 Between;
1. Obulapuram Paramasivam Reddy, S. /o Manikya Reddy, Aged about 68 yrs, R/o Pudi Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District.
2. Obulapuram Sivakumar, S/o Rathna Reddy @ Rathnam Reddy, Aged 48yrs, R/o Pudi Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District
3. Obulapuram Viswanadham @ Obulapuram Viswanathan, S/o Paramasivam, Aged 37 yrs, R/o Pudi Village, Tada Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through The Station House Officer, Tada Police Station, Rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners; M/s INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent; PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 528 of BNSS., is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the CriminalPetition, the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition requiring the petitioner to
mark his attendance before the Investigating officer on every Saturday between 10.00 a.m and 5.00 p.miill filing of the charge sheet and permit the petitioners to travel outside the district limits, whichever is earlier, in the order of CRL.P.No. 12662 of 2025 dated 16.12.2025; The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). The Court made the following ORDER: The present petition is filed seeking to relax the condition Nos. iv & v; imposed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 in Crl.P.No.12662 of 2025. Heard the
learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. Considering the submissions made, the condition No.(v), imposed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.12.2025 in Crl.P.No.12662 of 2025, alone is relaxed. Accordingly, the petition is partly allowed.
SD/- G.HELANAIDU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The Station House Officer, Tada Police Station, Tirupathi District.
2. One CC to Ms. INDUS LAW FIRM, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. [OUT]
4. One spare copy
4 .
HIGH COURT DR.VJP, J DATED: 11/03/2026
ORDER lA No. 2 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 12662 OF 2025 H ll ftKft ^ efspp^'t^ «-> c/> i •AAP •k '<.■ I.A. IS PARTLY ALLOWED.