2025:JHHC:34593 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.6371 of 2025 ----- Bhagirath Saha, son of late Jagdish Saha, R/o Pilghutu, PO Jonka, PS Tinpahar, District Sahibganj … Petitioner(s). Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO and PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 4.The Director National Health Mission, Namkum, PO and PS Namkum, District Ranchi 5.The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, Collectoriate Campus, PO, PS and District Sahibganj 6.The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, PO, PS and District Sahibganj 7.Chinta Mani Devi, wife of Dhanpat Saha, R/o Pilghutu, PO Jonka, PS Tinpahar, District Sahibganj … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. J. F. Toppo, GA-V …...... 02 /19.11.2025: Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that respondent no. 7 was appointed as Anganbari Sahiya in Cluster Mohanpur, Sahibganj on the basis of forged and fabricated documents. It is the case of the petitioner that respondent no. 4-the Director, National Health Mission has directed to take action against respondent no. 7 but no step has ultimately been taken. 3. Thus, this writ petition has been filed by this petitioner for a direction upon the respondents to take appropriate action against respondent no. 7. 4. After hearing the parties, I find that the grievance of the petitioner is in respect of appointment of respondent no. 7. He has come up with the plea that the respondent no. 7 has been appointed on the basis of some fake and fabricated documents. 2025:JHHC:34593 2 5. The allegation levelled against the respondent no. 7 needs proper enquiry. As per the petitioner there is factual finding regarding this which is at Annexure-2. 6. Considering the said submission, I direct the Director, National Heath Mission-respondent no. 4 to take appropriate steps in respect of the enquiry report after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the respondent no. 7 to defend her case. 7. It is expected that appropriate decision will be taken within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the respondent no. 7. 8. This writ petition is disposed of. 9. Be it noted that, this Court has not entered into the merits of this case. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19.11.2025 Tanuj/CP-2