2025:JHHC:35037 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 859 of 2019 -------- Anguri Khatoon, aged about 55 years, wife of Late Asgar Ali, Munshi, Sırka Colliery, P.S. Sirka, P.O. Argada, District Ramgarh, resident of Village Sirka Colliery, P.O. Argada, P.S. Sirka, District Ramgarh. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Mr. Gopal Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Central Coalfields Limited, having its registered office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, 2. Mr. R.S. Mahapatra, son of not known to the petitioner, Director Personnel, Central Coalfields Limited, having its registered office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 3. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, General Manager, Sirka (A), Central Coalfields Limited, P.O. Argada, P.S. Sirka, District Ramgarh. 4. Mr N.G. Dey, son of not known to the petitioner, Personnel Manager, Sirka, OCP, Central Coalfields Limited, P.O. Argada, P.S. Sirka, District Ramgarh. 5.Mr. Krishna Murari, son of not known to the petitioner, Project Officer, (S.G.) Sirka, Central Coalfields Limited, P.O. Argada, P.S. Sirka, District Ramgarh. 6. The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. Vineet Sinha, Advocate -------- Order No. 08 /Dated: 20th November 2025 The instant contempt case has been filed by the petitioner for deliberately non-complying the order dated 10.01.2017 passed in W.P.(S) No. 830 of 2011. 2. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by the writ Court has been complied with. However, since interest on gratuity has not been given as such he prays that the instant contempt case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to claim 2025:JHHC:35037 2 interest on gratuity. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that if the petitioner so chooses to approach the concerned respondent he may do so and the same will be decided in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 20th November, 2025 Amit Uploaded on 25/11/2025