Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010284962014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1053/2014 Between:
1. ARUMALLA SITA NAGA RATNAM, W/O. SRINIVASARAO, AGED: 44 YEARS, HINDU,
OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 29-33-1, LAKSHNNIVASARAPUPELA, MAJAHNNUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. KUMILI RAMBABU, S/o. late Appulu, Aged: 55 years, Hindu, Occ: Employee, R/o. 11-4-1306/3, Chilalcalaguda, Railway Quarters, Secunderabad, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by the Decree and Judgment, Dt. 07-07-2014 passed in A.S.No. 43/2013, on the file of I Addl. District Judge, Rajahmundry East Godavari District, thereby remanding the matter in O.S.No. 718/2008, to the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1753 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the decree and judgernnt dated 07-07-2014 In AS.No. 43/2013 on the file of the I Addl. District Judge, Rajahmundry
2 JS,J C.M.A.No.1053/2014
IA NO: 4 OF 2014(CMAMP 36467 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
3 JS,J C.M.A.No.1053/2014
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
The matter was adjourned from time to time i.e., from 25.07.2025, at the request of learned counsel for the appellant. When the matter is listed on 20.11.2025, it was observed that the learned counsel for the appellant is not ready to argue the matter. Hence, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 04.12.2025 KAS
4 JS,J C.M.A.No.1053/2014
130 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1053/2014
Date: 04.12.2025 KAS