COCP-5300 IN THE HI 220 Teja Singh Sh. Rajesh K CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of 17102-2025 Naik (TS) Te 2. that the orde Bench of thi 5300-2025 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o ingh Versus jesh Kumar Singh and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.) Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present Contempt Petiti of order dated 01.07.2025 (Ann 2025, titled as ‘Union of India and TS) Teja Singh and another’, whereby “6. The submission of the p grant of disability pension w Allahabad which refused and r of respondent No.1, is noticed body which is responsible for has no authority to challenge Medical Board. If the report is be rejected as a whole and invalidate the concerned offici rejected in part. While allo allowing disability pension w dismissal from service. 7. We, therefore, uphold 15.02.2023 passed by the le petitioners to implement the sa months from today.” At the very outset, learned cou e order dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure of this Court stands duly complied w ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5300-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.01.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA V.C.). ate for the respondents. etition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-2) passed in CWP- a and others vs. No. 4456602, Ex. hereby it was directed as follows:- the petitioners that the claim for n was forwarded to PCDA (P), nd rejected the claim of disability ticed only to be rejected. A civil or the disbursement of pension nge the report of the Invaliding rt is to be rejected, the same has to and then there was no case to official. Such a report cannot be allowing invalidation and not n would amount to a wrongful old the impugned order dated e learned AFT and direct the he same within a period of three ed counsel for respondents submits exure P-2) passed by the Division lied with and disability pension has ging Ex. or ), ity vil on ng to to be ot ful ed he ee mits sion has RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.12 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-5300 been release petition filed Singh vs. 15.02.2023 ( Regional Be AFT) has a 25.11.2025 b survives in th 3. documents, is taken on r 4. Conferencin for the resp petition and 5. 6. required to b of. 7. 8. 09.01.2026 rishu 5300-2025 (O&M) -2- eleased to the petitioner. It is further filed by the petitioner bearing MA vs. Union of India and others, 2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the lea nal Bench, Chandigarh at Chandima has also been disposed by the lea 2025 being fully satisfied. It is accord es in the present petition. A copy of order dated 25.11.20 ents, handed over in Court by learne n on record. Learned counsel for the petitio rencing has not dispute the aforesaid su respondents and submits that noth n and the same may be disposed of, ac Heard. In view of the facts noted a ed to be passed in the present petition, Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable further submitted that the execution g MA(E)-2587-2023 titled as ‘Teja , for execution of order dated the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, andimandir (for short-‘the learned learned AFT vide order dated accordingly, submitted that nothing .11.2025 along with other relevant learned counsel for the respondents petitioner appearing through Video said submissions of learned counsel nothing survives in the present accordingly. oted above, no further orders are tition, and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No tion Teja ated nal, rned ated hing vant ents ideo nsel sent are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.12 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.