2025:JHHC:34478 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6382 of 2025 ------ Narsingh Prasad, age-66 years, S/o Late Bhadai Prasad, R/o NH-33, Kumrum Basti, Pardih, Mango PO- Pardih & PS-Mango, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Commercial Taxes, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at- Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2. The commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at- Utpad Bhawan, Kanke Road, P.O. Ranchi University & P.S.- Gonda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Jamshedpur Division, PO & PS- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Raman, AC to GA-III ------ 02/ 19th November,2025 1. Heard the parties. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for mandamus upon the respondent-State to immediately confirm the service of the petitioner and consequently to make payment of 1st, 2nd and 3rd ACP/MACP benefits especially taking into consideration that the petitioner has continuously served for more than 39 years without being promoted ever for a single occasion. 3. The admitted fact of this case is that the petitioner was appointed as a Peon in the department of Commercial Taxes and was posted in Jamshedpur Division under the then State of Bihar. After bifurcation of the State of Bihar, the service of the petitioner was taken over by the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner has worked as a Peon and superannuated on 31.04.2019. It is also an admitted fact that he is getting his pensionary benefit, but neither any promotion was given to the petitioner during his entire tenure of service nor he was granted the benefit of ACP/MACP. Claiming the said benefits, he had approach this, Court. 2025:JHHC:34478 2 4. It is the case of the petitioner that as his service was not confirmed by the Department, thus he has not been granted the benefit of ACP/MACP though, he has rendered continuous service for 39 years in the Department before his superannuation. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the service of the petitioner has not yet been confirmed and without confirmation of service, the petitioner is not entitled for ACP/MACP benefit. It has been further submitted that there was no sanctioned post, when petitioner was appointed. The fact that the petitioner had worked of 39 years and had superannuated from the department and that he is receiving the pensionary benefits, has not been denied by the State. His appointment is also not denied. 6. The aforesaid admitted facts of the case reflect the highest degree of exploitation by the State. After taking service from a Peon for 39 years and after his superannuation, the State’s plea that the service of this petitioner cannot be confirmed, is atrocious. This attitude is unbecoming of a model employer, which is unexpected from the State. Once when the employee has worked for 39 years and has superannuated and is receiving pension, the respondents cannot take a plea that his service cannot be confirmed, nor can deprive him of the benefits of ACP/MACP. The stand taken by the State Officials is deprecated. 7. Thus, a mandamus is issued to the State of Jharkhand and the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand is directed to take appropriate step to immediately confirm the service of the petitioner and grant him the benefit of ACP/MACP and revise the pension accordingly. The entire process should be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt a copy of this order. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19th November, 2025 Sandeep, cp2