( 2025:JHHC:33350 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 83 of 2025 1. Smt. Chanchala Kumari, aged about 64 years, wife of Jai Prakash Roy, resident of House of J. N. Chowdhary, Gali No. 8, Jai Prakash Nagar, PO, PS & District- Dhanbad 2. M/s A to Z Properties through its proprietress, Smt. Chanchala Kumari, wife of Jai Prakash Roy, Office at House of J. N. Chowdhary, Gali No. 8, Jai Prakash Nagar, PO, PS & District- Dhanbad 3. Jai Prakash Roy, aged about 66 years, son of Late Ujagar Prasad Roy, resident of House of J. N. Chowdhary, Gali No. 8, Jai Prakash Nagar, PO, PS & District- Dhanbad All are at present having residence-cum-office at Flat No. 605, Mangal Kunj Apartment, Hindustan Press Road, Dhaiya, PO: Nag Nagar, PS: Barwadda, District- Dhanbad ……….Petitioners -Versus- 1. M/s Bhavesh Commotrade (P) Ltd., through its Director, Suresh Kumar Agarwalla @ Suresh Kumar Agarwal, son of Late Ramrikshpal Agarwal, having its Registered Office at Salket Place, Barrackpur, PO & PS: Barrackpur, Town and District- Howrah (West Bengal) and Corporate Office at B-1/55, Shastri Nagar, West Professor Colony, PO: Dhanbad, PS: Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad. 2. Tarun Kanti Ghosal, son of Late Shishir Kumar Ghosal (Constituted Attorney of Plaintiff No. 4 to 8), resident of Devipara (Telipara), Hirapur, P.O., P.S. & District- Dhanbad. 3. Maya Paul, widow of Late Rabindra Nath Paul 4. Binay Krishna Paul, 5. Amiya Kumar Paul, both sons of Late Satya Narayan Paul, 6. Bani Brata Paul, 7. Uday Shankar Paul, both sons of Late Nirmal Kumar Paul, All are residents of Patthar Kothi, Purana Bazaar, Dhanbad, PO: Dhansar, PS: Bank More, District- Dhanbad. …………Opp. Parties ( 2025:JHHC:33350 ) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : None For the Opp. Parties : 04/Dated: 07/11/2025 On repeated calls nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 2. I.A. No.8240 of 2025 has been filed for condonation of delay of 3 days in filing the present review petition. 3. For the reasons assigned in the I.A, prayer made in I.A. is allowed. I.A. No.8240 of 2025 stands allowed and disposed of and accordingly, delay of 3 days in filing the present review petition is condoned. 4. This petition has been filed for review and rectify order dated 21.04.2025 passed by this Court in C.M.P. No. 515 of 2023 on the ground of non consideration of observation made in Civil Revision No. 30 of 2014. 5. In order dated 21.04.2025 passed in C.M.P. No. 515 of 2023, orders passed in Title Suit No. 92 of 2010, First Appeal No. 43 of 2012, Civil Revision No. 30/2014 have already been considered and thereafter the said order has been passed. 6. The order dated 21.04.2025 is a reasoned order. The Court finds that there is no apparent error on the face of record. It is well settled that review petition can be entertained if apparent error is there on the face of record. 7. In view of above, the Court finds that there is no apparent error on the face of record and accordingly, this civil review petition is dismissed. Pending I.A, if any, stands dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dt. 7.11.2025 Satyarthi/