Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40073 (JHR)

RAHUL KALINDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9167/2025 · 2025-12-04

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2025:JHHC:36376) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9167 of 2025 1. Rahul Kalindi, aged about 20 years, son of Somapado Kalindi, resident of village- Dobodungri, P.O.- Bantanagar, P.S.- R.I.T, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan 2. Dharmendra Baskey, aged about 45 years, S/o Lt John Baskey, R/o Bagbera, C.P. Tola, P.O & P.S. Bagbeda, at present residing Bantanagar PHD, P.O. Bantanagar, P.S.- R.I.T., Distt. Seraikella- Kharsawan … Petitioners - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. --- 03/04.12.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No. 105 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No.67 of 2025, S.T. Case No.37 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 238(a), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Serailkella. 23.11.2024 at about 6:30A.M., informant came to know that his son Sambhu Lohar was lying in injured condition in his house. The informant rushed to the place of occurrence and saw that his son had died and his head was crushed by a heavy stone. Statement of witness Akhan Kairawat has been recorded during investigation, in which he has stated that the petitioners suspected that the deceased had taken away their mobile phones. He has further stated that both the petitioners went to the house of the deceased. After some time, they returned and told this witness that they had murdered the deceased as he was not returning their mobile phones. Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. has submitted that on the basis of confession of the petitioner No.2, bloodstained cloth was recovered whereas on the basis of confession of petitioner No.1, the motorcycle used in the commission of the offence was also recovered. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) December 4, 2025 Jay/-