APHC010491132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25319/2023 Between: 1. KARRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O SRI SUBBI REDDY, HINDU, AGE. 50 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NA, 2-15, POLAMURU 533 342, ANAPARTHI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI 522 237, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM 533 003, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM 533 003, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAPARTHI CIRCLE, ANAPARTHI - 533 342, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAPARTHI P.S., ANAPARTHI - 533 342, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing the 'Rowdy Sheets' against the Petitioners in Anaparthi PS as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Police Standing Orders and for a consequential direction directing the Respondents to drop all further proceedings by closing the 'Rowdy Sheets' against the.' Petitioners forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing the 'Rowdy Sheets' against the Petitioners in Anaparthi PS as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the Police Standing Orders and for a consequential direction directing the Respondents to drop all further proceedings by closing the 'Rowdy Sheets' against the.' Petitioners forthwith and pass ...” At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the cause does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State is in attendance. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*