APHC010263592011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 451 OF Between: 1. SRI BAPUJI YUVAJANA SEVA SANGHAM,, REP.BY ITS IT'S PRESIDENT MR.GADDAM MALYADRI, F.P. SHOP DEALER,SHOP NO 2 PONNALUR (V) & )(M) PRAKASAM DISTRICT 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (CS), PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR CS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PONNALUR (M), PONNALURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K HEMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 451 OF 2011 SRI BAPUJI YUVAJANA SEVA SANGHAM,, REP.BY ITS IT'S PRESIDENT MR.GADDAM MALYADRI, F.P. SHOP DEALER,SHOP NO 2 PONNALUR (V) & )(M) PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (CS), PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE JOINT COLLECTOR CS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM THE TAHSILDAR MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PONNALUR (M), PONNALURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA SRI BAPUJI YUVAJANA SEVA SANGHAM,, REP.BY ITS IT'S PRESIDENT MR.GADDAM MALYADRI, F.P. SHOP DEALER,SHOP ...PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (CS), PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE JOINT COLLECTOR CS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM THE TAHSILDAR MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PONNALUR (M), ...RESPONDENT(S): THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 451 OF 2011 ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on 16.12.2025 and 23.12.2025 and today also there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. 2. The present Writ Petition is therefore dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA, J Date: 31.12.2025 KK