Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40066 (AP)

CHEVUTURI KODANDAIAH v. V.LAVANYA

CC/4997/2022 · 2025-12-30

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010603212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4997/2022 Between: 1. CHEVUTURI KODANDAIAH, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.GUDLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. V LAVANYA, Presently working as Tahsildar, Gudluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to notice the respondents and punish them for their wilfull, deliberate and wanton violation of the Order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.19404 of 2022, dated 07.07.2022, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. T BALASWAMI The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE No. 4997 of 2022 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed for non implementation of the interim orders, dated 07.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.19404 of 2022, wherein this Court directed the 4th respondent therein to consider the orders passed by the Sub Collector, Kandukur vide D.Dis.No. /4681/2017, dated 16.10.2021 and pass appropriate orders, within four weeks. 2. After issuing notice, the respondent-Tahsildar filed reply. Along with reply, respondent has also placed proceedings dated 10.10.2022, whereby the respondent considered the orders of the Sub Collector, Kandukur and passed appropriate orders. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no willful or deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. 4. Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 31.12.2025 KBN 3 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE No.4977 of 2022 Date: 31.12.2025 KBN