Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
316 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17332-2025 Date of decision: 07.05.2025 DEVEN KASHYAP ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Su
kshan Sharma, Advocate for the pe
oner. Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, DAG, Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA,
J. (ORAL)
Petition for Regular Bail under Section 483 BNSS FIR No. Dated Police Sta
on Sec
ons 27 21.01.2024 Sadar Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar 22(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act
1. Status report by way of affidavit on behalf of the State has been handed over in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the pe
oner.
2. At this stage, counsel for the pe
oner submits that he has video recording to show the false implica
on and he would be permi4ed to withdraw the present pe
on with liberty to file a complaint against police official for false implica
on to the DGP annexing affidavit of Khalid-Sarpanch and file fresh pe
on with be4er par
culars.
3. Given above, the present pe
on is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Pending applica
ons, if any, stand disposed of. 07.05.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.05.09 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document