IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (105) CWP-8925-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:- 23.07.2025 Satish ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate, with Mr. Arishdeep Mraad, Advocate, Mr. Khushwant Saharam, Advocate, and Ms. Chetna Rao, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time and having failed to convince this Court, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take recourse to the remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 3. Pending applications stand disposed of. (SUVIR SEHGAL) 23.07.2025 JUDGE Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.07.23 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment