SHANDAR ALI ALIAS SHANDAR ALAM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9614/2025 · 2025-11-27
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40060 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40060 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:35431 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 9614 of 2025
1. Shandar Ali @ Shandar Alam Ansari, aged about 31 years, son of Md.
Mahmood @ Mahmood Alam Ansari, resident of Village- Ledatand,
P.O.- Madaidih, P.S.- Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad.
2. Md. Dilshad Ansari @ Md. Dilshad, aged about 29 years, son of Md.
Badruddin @ Md. Badruddin Ansari, resident of Village- Ledatand,
P.O.- Madaidih, P.S.- Topchanchi, District- Dhanbad.
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…. Opp. Party
------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Praful Jojo, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
----- 3/ 27.11.2025 Heard the parties.
2.
Petitioners have been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 392 of 2025 arising out of Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024 for the offences registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 325, 326 & 506, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XI, Dhanbad.
3.
On 20.03.2024 at about 09:00 am, petitioner along with co-accused persons had assaulted the informant and his family members, causing injury to several persons. It appears that son of the informant, namely, Ehtesham Ansari succumbed to his injuries.
4.
It was submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the accused persons. It was further submitted that several similarly situated co- accused persons have been granted bail by this Court, as well as by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
5.
Mr. Pratiush Lala, learned counsel appearing for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6.
In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XI, Dhanbad, in connection with S.T. No. 392 of 2025 arising out of Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 27.11.2025