GOPAL LAL SAINI S/O LATE SH. CHOTURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15519/2025 · 2025-12-10
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40059 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40059 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:50215] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15519/2025
1. Gopal Lal Saini S/o Late Sh. Choturam, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Kharda Ki Dhani, Near Water Tank. Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Police Station Khorabisal, Jaipur (Presently Incarcerated In Jaipur Central Jail)
2. Banshi Lal Saini S/o Sh. Kaanaram Saini, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Kharda, Ki Dhani Niwaru, Police Station, Khorabisal, Jaipur. (Presently Incarcerated In Jaipur Central Jail) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. with Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 10/12/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.64/2025 registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 110, 189(2), 117(2) & 3(5) of B.N.S.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 12.11.2025. Counsel further submits that the petitioners were not present at the time of alleged incident and no one sustained any grievous injuries. Trial/investigation of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further
[2025:RJ-JP:50215] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15519/2025] incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the custody period of the petitioners & the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Gopal Lal Saini S/o Late Sh. Choturam & Banshi Lal Saini S/o Sh. Kaanaram Saini, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /339