SARFU @ SARFUDDIN MAULA S/O SHADI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12782/2025 · 2025-10-08
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40046 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40046 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40872] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12782/2025 Sarfu @ Sarfuddin Maula S/o Shadi, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Nangal, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 08/10/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.137/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for offence under Sections 132, 109(1) BNS-2023 and Section 3, 5, 8, 9 of RBA Act and Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He contended that name of the petitioner does not find place in the FIR. He further submits that co-accused-Shadi Khan and Talim have already been enlarged on bail on 25.09.2025, therefore, on the ground of parity, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served
[2025:RJ-JP:40872] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12782/2025] by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sarfu @ Sarfuddin Maula S/o Shadi, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/24