Mandapati Yesu Babu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLRC/1205/2010 · 2025-11-05
Subhendu Samanta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40041 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40041 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1205 of 2010 APHC010489292010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1205 OF 2010 Between:
1. Mandapati Yesu Babu,, S/o Prasada Rao, Employee, R/o Kovvada, Bhimavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad. 2. Lankalapali Ananda Rao, S/o Nageswara Rao, R/o Prasada Nagar, V.T.Agraharam, Vizianagaram District. ...Respondents Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto prefer the present Crl.R.C., aggrieved by the Calendar and Judgment, dt.28-06-2010 in Crl.A.No. 12 of 2008 by the learned Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, thereby confirming the calendar and Judgment dt.17-03-2008 in CC.No. 49 of 2006 passed by the learned Addl. J.F.C.M., Vizianagaram. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 1735 OF 2010
SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1205 of 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge him on bail by suspending the operation of calendar and judgment dt.28.06.2010 in Crl.A.No. 12 of 2008 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, wherein calendar and Judgemnt dted 17.03.2008 in CC.No. 49/2006 passed by the Learned Addl. Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Vizianagaram was confirmed , pending disposal of the main Criminal Revision Case IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1011 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in Crl.RC.MP.No.1735 of 2010 in Crl.RC.No.1205 of 2010 dt.13.06.2010. Counsel for the Petitioner: NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:V V L N SARMA
SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1205 of 2010 The Court made the following ORDER:
1. It is the submission on behalf of the prosecution that a report from the Station House Officer, Vizianagaram Rural Police Station has reached where from it appears that the petitioner/ accused of this matter, namely, Mandapati Yesu Babu has expired on 30.08.2016. Let the report placed by the Station House Officer concerned be taken on record. 2.
Considering the entire situation, as the petitioner/ accused has already been expired, there is nothing left for this Court to decide. 3. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case became infructuous and the same is hereby disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 06.11.2025 Dvs
SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1205 of 2010 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
22
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1205 OF 2010 Date:06.11.2025 Dvs