Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40040 (JHR)

ROHIT KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1275/2025 · 2025-11-21

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:34803 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1275 of 2025 ---- 1. Rohit Kumar S/o Balgovindu Sahu, Age 23 years, R/o near main road Kathitand, P.O. Ratu, P.S. Ratu, Kathitand, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand – 835222 2. Kumar Sahil S/o Virendra Jha, Age-22 Years, R/o South from Rani Pokhar, Sheohar, Bahuaraa, P.O & P.S Sheohar, Bihar 843329 3. Abhishek Singh S/o Anirudh Singh, Age 23 Years, R/o P.O & P.S - Sherghati, Gaya, Bihar – 824211 4. Shashwat Solanki S/o Prabhat Kumar Singh, Age 20 years, R/o Hajipur Vaishali, P.O & P.S Gandhi Ashram, Vaishali, Bihar – 844101 5. Jwala Kumar Gautam, S/o Raju Kumar Gautam, Age-19 Years, R/o Vill. And PO- Gaini, PS Khudwan, Aurangabad, Gaini, Daudnagar, Bihar- 824113 6. Himanshu Shekhar S/o Shivpal Yadav, Age 20 Years, R/o Rewar, P.O & P.S- Chandwar, Hazaribag Jharkhand 825301 7. Anant Kumar S/o Kumar Kunal Bandhu, Age 20 Years, R/o Vill. Ub PO- Bharub, PS- Obra, Aurangabad, Bihar 824124…. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Kshiti Bhusan Das, Vice Chancellor Central University of Jharkhand through, Ratu Lohardaga Road, P.O Brambe, P.S Mandar, Dist. Ranchi …. …. Opposite Party(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Paritosh Rai, Adv. Mr. Vijay Shankar, Adv. Mr. Imran Hassan, Adv. For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Adv. Mr. K.S. Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Ritwik Raj, Adv. ---- 03/Dated: 21st November, 2025 1. The present contempt case has been filed for non-compliance of the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) Filing No.9316 of 2025. 2025:JHHC:34803 Page | 2 Cont. Case (Civil) No.1275 of 2025 2. It appears that after filing of the present contempt petition, a reasoned order has been passed by the Opposite Party No.2 on 29.09.2025 which has been brought on record by filing show cause. 3. In view of the reasoned order, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt case with a liberty to file fresh application. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the present contempt case is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 21st November, 2025 Amar/- Uploaded on 24.11.2025