Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40040 (BOM)

DILIP HAUSERAO PATIL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/1840/2025 · 2025-07-08

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17-IA-1840-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1840 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 535 OF 2025 Dilip Hauserao Patil ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent __________ Mr. Ravi Kadam, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Intervenor. Mr. Shriram S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Shailesh Chavan i/b Mr. Milind Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the Applicant. __________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 8th JULY 2025. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Ravi Kadam, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Intervenor, Mr. Shailesh Chavan, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Shriram Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. 2. By the present Application, the Applicant is seeking intervention in Criminal Bail Application No. 535 of 2025. The Intervenor claims to be the investor/depositor, who alleges to have been cheated by the Applicant and others. 3. Mr. Shailesh Chavan, learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has no objection for allowing the intervenor to intervene in Criminal Bail Application No. 535 of Gitalaxmi 17-IA-1840-2025.doc 2025. Mr. Shriram Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent also does not have any objection. 4. In view of the above, the intervention application is allowed. The Intervenor is permitted to intervene in Criminal Bail Application No. 535 of 2025. 5. Interim Application No. 1840 of 2025 stands disposed of in the abovesaid terms. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] Gitalaxmi GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.07.09 10:44:17 +0530