HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 667/2023 Sarita Kohli and Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. q vs Malvika Gupta .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 26.08.2025 Though learned counsel for the respondent has filed objections to the present petition whereby he has opposed the petition preferred by the petitioners, however, Mr. Navyug Sethi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that he has no objection in case the present petition is allowed and impugned order is upheld. His statement is taken on record. In view of aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, present petition is allowed and consequently impugned order dated 27.07.2023 passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jammu in a Criminal Revision is upheld. Hence, present petition is disposed of along with connected CM(s). Meanwhile, interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 26.08.2025 Sushant Sr. No. 41