IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY, OF DECEMBER,^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9102 OF 2025 ^ i Between: Duvvana Boina Nagaseshu @ Duvvanaboyana Nagaseshu, S/o. D. Gangunaidu, aged about 29 Visakhapatn^, Visakhapatnam DistricCA.P. years, R/o. Bennabhupal^atnam, ... Petitioner/Accused No.4 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondent Petition under Sections 437 & 4^ of Cr.P.C, and Sec.4M & 483 of BNSS, 'braying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.281/2021 of Payakaraopeta P.S., Anakapalli District; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.GOLLAPALLI MAHE^ARA RAO Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the Court made the following. 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.9102 of2025 Dated 26.12.2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.4 on bail in Cr.No.281 of 2021 of Payakaraopeta Police Station, Visakhapatnam Rural registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.4 herein for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 read with 8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned 2. Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.4 is that he had allegedly indulged in dealing with 350 kgs of ganja. Undoubtedly, it is a commercial quantity and also a colossal quantity. The role of the petitioner came to light based on the confession of Accused No.1. The petitioner is the brother-in-law of Accused No.1. The petitioner surrendered on 26.06.2025. He has been in judicial custody for the past 183 days. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the charge sheet has not been filed. The petitioner/Accused r 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.9102 of2025 Dated 26.12.2025 No.4 is a resident of Bennabhupalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. He has got fixed abode. The material portion of the investigation is completed. All the prosecution witnesses are official witnesses. Hence, the question of the petitioner influencing or threatening the witnesses or hampering the investigation may not arise. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that no report was 4. filed before the learned Court below by the learned Public Prosecutor concerned seeking for extension period of judicial custody of the petitioner upto one year by indicating the progress of investigation and the specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the initial period. Section 36A(4) of ‘the NDPS Act’ states that if the investigation is not 5. completed within 180 days, the Petitioner/Accused No.4 has an indefeasible right to bail, unless the Special Court extends the period up to one year on the report of the Public Prosecutor, indicating the progress of the investigation and specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the initial period. 6. Considering the period of detention undergone by the Petitioner/Accused No.4 in judicial custody for the past 183 days, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the petitioner, and his alleged role played in the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the following stringent conditions: 4 Dr. YLR, J Crt.P.No.9102 of2025 Dated 26.12.2025 i. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall be enlarged on bail subject to him executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only), with two sureties for the like each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yelamanchili. ii. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till the filing of the Charge Sheet. sum iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned, iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall cooperate with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall make himself available for interrogation by the investigating officer as and when required, vi. The Petitioner/Accused No.4 shall not, directly indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuari<= V. or 5 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.9102 of2025 Dated 26.12.2025 him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. 7. registrar DEPU //TRUE COPY// sect/on officer To, The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-Spl.Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. The Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yallamanchili fhe Station House Officer, Payakaraopeta Police Station, Anakapalli District. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District One CC to Sri. Gollapalli Maheswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P [OUT] One spare copy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. HIGH COURT DR.YLR.J DATED:26/12/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.9102 of 2025 ALLOWED C5f SR 2 9 DEC m CD ★