DR. GHANSHYAM GUPTA SON OF SH. MANOHAR LAL GUPTA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/10363/2025 · 2025-10-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40034 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40034 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10363/2025 Dr. Ghanshyam Gupta Son Of Sh. Manohar Lal Gupta, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 45-B, Shastri Nagar, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner, College Education, Dr. Radha Krishnan Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 08/10/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the aggrieved petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed, (i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to re- sanction the benefit of selection scale to the Petitioner from the initial date of appointment. (ii) To direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits to the petitioners under the
career
advancement
scheme.
[2025:RJ-JP:41412] (2 of 2) [CW-10363/2025] (iii) To direct respondents to revise all retrial benefits of the petitioner in accordance with the senior scale and selection grade. (iv) Grant any other order against the Respondents that this Hon'ble court deems just, reasonable and proper.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /54