HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27779 of 2022 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today be learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 20.02.2008 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 13.03.2008, of Case No. 147 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 1068 of 2007, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Chandausi, District Sambhal at Chandausi, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) / Fast Track Court, Sambhal at Chandausi, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the case relates to matrimonial dispute and that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the case. In pursuance to order of this Court, both the parties have filed compromise before the Trial Court, which has duly been verified and report of the same is available on record. It was submitted that impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has opposed the application but it could not be disputed that compromise has been verified by the Trial Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar, G.A. Shyam Pal Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 7. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 8. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 528 BNSS. In the instant case, the matter relates to matrimonial dispute. Applicant no. 1 is husband and applicant no. 2 is mother-in-law of opposite party no. 2. The dispute between the parties is private in nature and if parties compromise the matter, it would not have any adverse impact on society. Both the parties have filed compromise before the Trial Court, which has duly been verified by the Court concerned. In view of these facts and circumstances, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge-sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case, against applicants, namely, Shyam Pal Singh and Smt. Maharani are hereby quashed. 10. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 24, 2025 SK Srivastava A482 No. 27779 of 2022 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad