Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40032 (AP)

T.Ramana Reddy v. Union of India

WP/2967/2018 · 2025-11-20

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010067542018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2967/2018 Between: 1. T.RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O.P.VENKATA RAMI REDDY, RJO.D.NO.7/135 E, C.KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, 2. N.ESWAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O.N.PEDDA VEERA REDDY, R/O.D.NO.7/6, C.KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY CUM SPECIAL OFFICER UNDER NATIONAL AGRICULTURE INSURANCE SCHEME, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, NEW DELHI 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. GENERAL MANAGER, AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD, 8TH FLOOR, UNITED INDIA TOWERS, BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD - 500029. 4. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, NEW COLLECTORATE BUILDING, GOVERNMENT ARTS COLLEGE ROAD, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2 JS, J W.P.No.2967/2018 5. AGRICULTURE OFFICER, VALLUR MANDAL, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to clear the petitioners crop insurance claim of Bengal gram crop of rabi season of 2012-2013 pending under National Agriculture Insurance Scheme (NA1S) on par with the similarly situated farmers of same village and mandal, whose crop insurance claim was cleared with interest from the date of the petitioners entitlement of the said amount under the scheme by declaring the inaction of the respondents by keeping the petitioners crop insurance claim pending for years together as illegal and arbitrary and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to expedite their action in considering the petitioners crop insurance claim of Rabai Season of 2012-13 on par with the similarly situated farmers of the same village and whose claims were cleared, pending Writ Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PELLETI RAJESH KUMAR (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) 3. BOTLA VENKATESWARA RAO 3 JS, J W.P.No.2967/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 21.11.2025 SCH 4 JS, J W.P.No.2967/2018 325 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2967/2018 Date: 21.11.2025 SCH