Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40031 (AP)

P.GANESH NAIDU v. MADDILA GURUNADHA RAO AND ANOTHERS

CRLRC/463/2012 · 2025-12-03

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010007482012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 463 OF 2012 Between: 1. P.GANESH NAIDU, S/O NARAYANA RAO R/O DIGUVA VEEDHI GAJULA REGA, VIZIANGARAM TOWN & DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MADDILA GURUNADHA RAO, S/O APPALA NAIDU R/O D.NO.11-6- 26/B, NAGASAPU VEEDHI, NEAR KALLA GOWRI SANKAR HOUSE, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order : A Memo, dated 28th November, 2025 is placed on record by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. It has been contended in the Memo that the matter has been settled out of Court with the Respondent No.1 and he intends not to proceed further in the present Criminal Revision Case. 2. The instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against an order of acquittal under Section 138 of N.I.Act, as the Petitioner being defacto complainant does not want to proceed with the matter further. 3. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as withdrawn. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 04.12.2025 KK