Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40023 (MAD)

M. Raghu, v. Tmt. A. Priyanka, I.A.S.,

CONT P/970/2025 · 2025-03-20

C Kumarappan, R Subramanian

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.03.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 M.Raghu ... Petitioner Vs. Tmt.A.Priyanka, I.A.S Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in WP.No.39403 of 2024 dated 24.01.2025 under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Additional Government Pleader ****** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN) The Writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to apply afresh. The order passed by the respondent shows that it teaches a lesson to us that we should not accept any representation made by any Government Pleader in future. The Office of the Government Pleader has been reduced to the level of a peon by the behavior of the Government Pleaders of the State. Hence, we, with a heavy heart, close this contempt petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order passed. No costs. [R.S.M., J.] [C.K., J.] 20.03.2025 kmi Index : No Speaking order : No NCC : No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 R. SUBRAMANIAN, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J. kmi CONT.P.No.970 of 2025 20.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis