Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40022 (RAJ)

DHARMENDRA S/O RAMESHWAR PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1095/2020 · 2025-10-03

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40166] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1095/2020 1. Dharmendra S/o Rameshwar Prasad, R/o Khutawali Dhani, Tan Singod Khurd, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Raj. 2. Himanshu S/o Anil Kumar Jat, R/o Tateda Mod, Nangal Kalan, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Raj. 3. Sanjay Choudhary S/o Ramavtar Jat, R/o Tateda Mod, Nangal Kalan, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Raj. 4. Dayaram S/o Banshidhar Yadav, R/o Near Badhala Cut, Govindgarh, District Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Raj. 5. Nanuram S/o Hanuman Sahay, R/o Khadda Ki Dhani, Jobner, Police Station Jobner, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. 2. Shankar Kumar Verma S/o Shri Kanaram Balai, R/o Ward No.08, Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 03/10/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer for quashing of FIR No.354/2019 registered at Police Station Govindgarh, Jaipur (Rural) for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323 [2025:RJ-JP:40166] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1095/2020] and 341 of IPC and Section 3(1)(f) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State submit the latest factual report dated 29.10.2023 and the same is taken on record. 3. As per the factual report, in pursuance of the investigation in the impugned FIR, a negative final report has already been submitted before concerned trial Court, therefore, this criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /56