APHC010103592020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. GUDISEVA GOPALA SWAROOP, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 21/452 NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, NAKKALA THOTA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 1. PARASA RAMESH, S/o Surya D.No. 14/234-3, Edepalli, Narayanapuram, Machilipatnam, Krishna District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. MATADA YUVASIVA SWAMY The Court made the following Challenging the Order C.C.No.299 of 2017 by the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 811 OF 2020 GUDISEVA GOPALA SWAROOP, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 21/452-A, BHASKARAPURAM, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, NAKKALA THOTA, MACHILIPATNAM, ...PETITIONER AND PARASA RAMESH, S/o Surya Narayana, aged about 66 years, R/o 3, Edepalli, Narayanapuram, Machilipatnam, Krishna ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Counsel for the Respondent: MATADA YUVASIVA SWAMY the following Order : Challenging the Order, dated 13.02.2020 in E.P.No.154 of 2018 in 299 of 2017 by the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3560] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA GUDISEVA GOPALA SWAROOP, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, A, BHASKARAPURAM, NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE, NAKKALA THOTA, MACHILIPATNAM, ...PETITIONER Narayana, aged about 66 years, R/o 3, Edepalli, Narayanapuram, Machilipatnam, Krishna ...RESPONDENT n E.P.No.154 of 2018 in 299 of 2017 by the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, the instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred by the Judgment Debtor. 2. It has been reported that pending Execution Petition (E.P) has disposed of, after recording compromise of both the parties before the Lok Adalath. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent/ Decree Holder also submits that the E.P has been settled on 05.07.2025, as it is appearing in the e-Courts Status. 4. On attending the facts and circumstances, nothing left to decide in the matter. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 06.11.2025 KK