PRADEEP v. UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORTION LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPMS/1597/2017 · 2025-02-25
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4002 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4002 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1333 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/1597/2017 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. None appears for the petitioner.
2. Mr. D.S.Patni, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Piyush Garg, learned learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned Sr. Advocate for the respondents submits that by the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for quashing of advertisement dated 21.06.2017 relating to a tender and since there is no stay order in favour of the petitioner, therefore, by efflux of time, present writ petition has become infructuous.
4. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.02.2025 SKS