Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4002 (RAJ)

M/S MM INDUSTRIES v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/979/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24795] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 979/2025 M/s Mm Industries, Alwar Having Its Office At 196, M.i.a, Alwar, Alwar- 301030 (Rajasthan) Through Its Sole Proprietor Shri Tarun Agarwal ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Having Its Office At Pant Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 2. State Level Sanctioning And Monitoring Committee, Constituted Under The Rajasthan Agro-Processing, Agri- Business And Agri-Export Promotion Policy, 2019 Through Its Ex-Officio Chairperson, The Principal Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Government Of Rajasthan, Having Its Office At Pant Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kothari For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Dhakad for Mr. R.A. Katta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file comprehensive representation before the concerned Authority. Permission sought for is granted. Accordingly, this civil writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Stay application as well as pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner before the concerned authority within a period of two weeks from today, concerned Authority is directed to consider and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of representation by way of passing a reasoned and speaking order [2025:RJ-JP:24795] (2 of 2) [CW-979/2025] in accordance with law. This Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, the representation, if any filed by the petitioner, may be decided in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /290