Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 40012 (CHH)

MUKESH KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9909/2025 · 2025-09-14

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:47186 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9909 of 2025 Mukesh Kumar Mishra S/o Shri Umakant Mishra, Aged About 41 Years Occupation- Service, Posted At - Assistant Director, Office Of Joint Director, Department Of Education, Bilaspur (Presently Under Suspension And Attached In The Office Of The Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Indravati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2. The Director, Directorate Public Instructions, Department Of School Education Indravati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3. The Collector, District Bilaspur C.G. 4. The Divisional Joint Director (Education) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 5. The Joint Director (Education), Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 6. The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 7. The District Treasury Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G. 8. Shikshak Sajha Manch Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjana Banjarey with Mr. S.B. Mukherjee, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional Advocate General. SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.09.16 10:48:38 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 15/09/2025 1. The petitioner has alternate remedy of filing of an appeal against the suspension order dated 04.072025 passed by under Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh as per Rule 9(1) (A) as it is appealable order. In the eventuality of filing of the appeal within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. The appellate Authority will not take plea of limitation and shall decide the appeal in accordance with the law on its own merit. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh