HARSH KHANDELWAL S/O VIMAL KUMAR GUPTA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14566/2025 · 2025-09-23
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40011 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 40011 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14566/2025 Harsh Khandelwal S/o Vimal Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Ramgarh Pachwara, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 2195843) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Headquarter, Barmer.
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Barmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 23/09/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was declared successful in the selection process for the post of Teacher Grade-III, Level 2 (Science–Math) under the MBC (M) Category (Annexure-2). He further submits that the petitioner is a disabled candidate, suffering from Locomotor Disability to the extent of 75% in both upper limbs as well as both lower limbs, and in this regard, the Medical Department has issued a disability certificate (Annexure-3). He further submits that in terms of the
[2025:RJ-JP:39170] (2 of 3) [CW-14566/2025] circular dated 18.05.2020, preference ought to be granted to the petitioner.
2. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition,
learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2 - The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in light of the circular dated 18.05.2020.
2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 - The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner, within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law.
4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner.
5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the
[2025:RJ-JP:39170] (3 of 3) [CW-14566/2025] petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law.
6. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/22