APHC010688002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35304/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK PARVEEN BEGUM, W/O S. MUNNA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, H.NO.2-144-P-D-19A, PEDDAPADAKHANA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK NOUSHEEN SULTANA,, W/O S.AZEEM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE,H.NO.2/137H, BK5, PEDDAPADAKHAN, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK IBAL, S/O S. MAQBOOL AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE JOB, H.N0.2-144-F-D-19-V-P, PEDDAPADAKHAN KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUNKARA CHARAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent in proceeding with the construction of public toilets right opposite the petitioners’ property. 2. It is submitted that there are available public toilets at the end of the street; however, the proposal to construct public toilets right in the midst of a densely populated colony would result in severe inconvenience to the residents. In this regard, the petitioners submitted a representation dated 17.11.2025, which is pending consideration by the 2nd respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 2nd respondent be directed to dispose of the representation by duly taking into account, the objections raised by the residents of the area. 4. Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed off, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the objections raised by the petitioners and others who are residing the said vicinity and pass necessary orders within a period of four (4) weeks. Pending considering of the said representation, the further construction of the public toilets is stayed. There shall no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.20.12.2025 SR