D/L82 14.01.2025 Bpg. ct.no.35 W.P.A.101 of 2025 Surmila Begum Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Suddhadev Adak Ms. Richa Pramanik. …for the petitioner. Mr. Wasim Ahmed Mr. Harun-al-Rashid. …for the State-respondents. Learned advocate for the petitioner do not intend to proceed with the present writ petition. Mr. Ahmed, learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the victim girl has already returned and she has made a statement under Section 183 of BNSS. In view of the changed circumstances and the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner not proceeding with the writ petition, WPA 101 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. Report so submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 2 Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)