Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4000 (AP)

BOBBILI RAMA KRISHNA RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1458/2025 · 2025-01-22

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A ■ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) _ WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY fn TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA WRIT PETITION NO: 1458 OF 2025 \o PRASAD Between; Bobbin Rama Krishna Raju, S/o.B.Mulaswamy, aged about Business, D No. 4-270, Gowthami Nagar, Vakalapudi 52 years, Occu; Kakinada - 533005. ...PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its PrI Secretary Revenue (Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner and inspector General of Registration ^ Department, 0/c. D.No.5-59, R.K. Spring Vallen Apartments Kandipadu Mandal, Vijayawada Krishna District. 3. The District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department Court Compound, Kakinada District. 4. The Sub-Registrar, Registration and Stamps Department, Samarlakota Kakinada District. 5. Uppuluri Venkata Ratna Prasanthi, W/o. UppuluriBramaji, Aged about 44 years, R/o.D.No.85-40-05, Model Colony Rajamahendravaram (urban). East Godavari District. and Stamps , Edugally, Kakinada, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution that in the circumstances stated of India is filed praying in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No.3 and 4 on representation dated 06-01-2025 and permitting ^ the 5th Respondent to execute the deeds in favour of the third parties without consent of the petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary and colorable exercise with the powers and violation of legal rights under Article 19(g), 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India. Consequentially direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to permit the 5th respondent to registered in any document relating to the approved layout dated 19-06-2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 and 4 to consider the representation dated 06-01-2025 and pass the appropriate orders pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T N M RANGA RAO STAMPS Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND Counsel for the Respondent No.5: — The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010026052025 [33281 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1458/2025 Between: 1.BOBBILI RAMA KRISHNA RAJU, S/O.B.MULASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS, D NO. 4-270, GOWTHAMI NAGAR, VAKALAPUDI, KAKINADA- 533005. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY REVENUE(STAMP AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, 0/C D.NO.5-59, R.K. SPRING VALLEN APARTMENTS, EDUGALLY, KANDIPADU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT KAKINADA, COURT COMPOUND. KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4.THE SUBREGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, SAMARLAKOTA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5.UPPULURI VENKATARATNA PRASANTHI, W/0. UPPULURIBRAMAJI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.85-40-05, MODEL COLONY RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM (URBAN). EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): f i I Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TN M RANGARAO ▼ 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1 .GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri TN.M. Ranga Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to approach this Court if the settlement Learned Counsel would submit that the Writ Petitioner has talks failed, instructed him that some settlement talks are going on between the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent No.5. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to approach the Court in the event that the settlement talks failed between the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent No.5. No order as to costs. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. 4. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SE OFFICER \ //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri T N M Ranga Rao Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Registration and Stamps, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. TF HIGH COURT DATED:22/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.1458 of 2025 dismissing the WP COSTS AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT