Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39998 (AP)

K.Srinivasa Varma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Social Welfare Department,

WP/17685/2015 · 2025-11-18

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010456752015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 17685 OF 2015 Between: 1. K.Srinivasa Varma, S/o Narasimha Raju, aged about 45 years, Rio D.No.5-5-25/1B, Eagalavari Street, Tuni, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Principal Secretary. 2. The Joint Collector/Chairman, District Purchase Committee, DSWREI Society, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 3. The Principal/Convenor, The A.P. Social Welfare Residential School/ Junior College (Boys), Lakshminarsapuram (P), Anaparthi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Tender Notice in Rc.No.A2/106/2015-16, dated 11.5.2015 issued by the 2nd respondent herein is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 19(i)(g) of the Constitution of India and set aside the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE SRK, J W.P.No.17685 of 2015 2 The Court made the following ORDER: Challenging the Tender Notice issued by 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A2 / 106 / 2015-16, dated 11.05.2015, the present Writ Petition has been filed. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:19.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.17685 of 2015 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.17685 of 2015 Date:19.11.2025 Nsr