Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:81222-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10661 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sombir Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjit Kumar Yadav,Vikas Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner has primarily sought a mandamus directing the concerned respondent to provide him adequate security. Further, the petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide the fresh representation dated 3.10.2022 moved by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances, the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that respondent no.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, respondent no.2/Police Commissioner, District Agra is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 RKK/- (Dr Y K Srivastava, J) (Shekhar B Saraf, J) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad