11-SA-896-2001.doc Arjun IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.896 OF 2001 Krishna Laxman Malve …Appellant Versus Shri Radhanagari Taluka …Respondents Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14 OF 2006 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.896 OF 2001 Krishna Laxman Malve …Applicant Versus Shri Radhanagari Taluka …Respondents Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Ors. _______________________________________________________________ None for the Appellant. Ms. Bhargavi Patil i/b M. S. Topkar, for Respondent No.5. Mr. D. J. Haldankar, AGP, for the Respondent-State. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 09 JULY 2025 P.C.: 1. This matter was called out in the morning session. As none appeared for the Appellant in the morning sessions, the same has been kept back in the afternoon session. In the afternoon session also none appears for the Appellant. 2. Accordingly, Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. As the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, nothing survives in the Civil Application and the same is also disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.07.09 19:40:20 +0530