APHC010428362017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 27011/2017 Between: 1. C. TRINETRA KUMAR S/O. PEDDA PEERAIAH, LICENSEE OF BHIRAVA WINES, PORUM.AMILLA, R/O DASARAPALLI VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY EXCISE, DEPT., C. P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER PROH EXCISE DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 3. THE PROHIBITION EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT PRODDUTUR YSR, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE PROHIBITION EXCISE INSPECTOR BADVEL YSR KADAPA, DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus under article 226 of the constitution of India declaring the show cause notice issued by the 3rd respondent herein in Rc. No. A3/247/2017 dated 27.7.2017 calling upon the petitioner herein to submit explanation as to why action shall not be taken for contravention of AP excise Act, 1968 and AP excise (Grant Of License Of Selling By Shop And Conditions of License) Rules 2012 without indicating any overt act attracting the contravention of the provision of AP Excise Act 1968 or Rules made thereunder or conditions of license as illegal, arbitrary, without application of mind and without jurisdiction and to set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 3838 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt: 11.08.2017 in WPMP No. 33558 of 2017 in WP No. 27011 or 2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 33558 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the 3rd respondent herein in Rc. No. A3/247/2017 dated 27.7.2017 to the petitioner herein Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.27011 OF 2017 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared virtually and submitted that as the criminal case registered against the petitioner has been dismissed, the impugned notice has been rendered infructuous and therefore no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.11.2025 KBN 54 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.27011 of 2017 Date: 17.11.2025 KBN